We explore where the real gains are being made, and why thoughtful integration still matters

Generative AI in Software Development - The Measured Impact

Generative AI is restructuring the pace of software development. By learning from billions of lines of existing code, it now helps engineers build, clean and manage their codebases with impressive speed. Whether it is suggesting function logic, flagging inefficiencies, or even writing documentation, AI tools are increasingly taking over the more repetitive parts of the job. This gives developers room to focus on higher level thinking, design, architecture and cross functional collaboration.

The statistics support what many developers are already seeing in their day to day work. In a controlled study by GitHub, developers using Copilot completed a standard JavaScript task 55 per cent faster than those without the tool. On average, the time dropped from two hours and forty one minutes to just over an hour. These kinds of gains have been mirrored in broader surveys. Stack Overflow found over 80 per cent of developers report increased productivity and faster learning as a result of AI assistants. GitHub Copilot, now used by over fifteen million developers, generates nearly half the lines of code written by those who use it regularly.

Accuracy and Oversight

But speed alone does not tell the whole story. Code that compiles successfully is not necessarily safe, scalable, or correct in the long run. Just because AI writes code quickly does not mean it always writes it well. While Copilot generated code is reportedly 56 per cent more likely to pass standard unit tests, these tests do not always cover the edge cases where things can go wrong. Logical flaws can still slip through, especially in complex systems or in sensitive domains such as healthcare, finance, or government infrastructure.

That is why human oversight remains essential. Successful teams do not take the output of generative AI at face value, they treat it as a starting point. Code written with AI is still reviewed carefully, tested against a wide range of scenarios and tailored to the specific requirements of the system it fits into. AI should accelerate the process, not replace professional judgement. Engineers are learning to prompt more precisely, review more critically and treat AI suggestions as an aid to deeper thinking rather than a shortcut.

Team Dynamics and Skills

As AI tools become part of daily workflows, the expectations placed on developers are evolving. It is no longer just about knowing a language or framework, but also about knowing how to work well with generative AI. Prompting is becoming a technical skill in its own right, one that blends language, logic and creativity. Employers are adapting their hiring processes to reflect this change. Some are testing not only for traditional coding ability, but also for how effectively candidates can prompt, evaluate and improve upon AI suggestions.

Even more notably, junior developers are entering the workforce with the expectation that they will collaborate with AI from the beginning. At many companies, new hires are being onboarded with tools like Copilot acting almost as a virtual mentor. The AI supports them with boilerplate and syntax, while they focus on understanding system structure, team practices and the broader business context. This model is beginning to change how we think about early career development in technology roles.

Major Players and Industry Investment

Leading tech firms are investing heavily in this shift. Amazon’s internal tool, named Kiro, offers real time coding support directly inside developers' working environments. Microsoft is embedding Copilot across its platforms, from Visual Studio to GitHub to Microsoft 365. Financial institutions such as JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs are building their own generative AI tools to assist with internal development and trading platforms. The goal is not just speed, but safety, consistency and maintainability.

Behind the scenes, work is being done to improve how AI models are trained. Many providers are building libraries of well documented, context rich examples to help AI produce better results. This foundational effort will be key to future success. The aim is for AI not just to generate code that works, but to produce solutions that are safe, efficient and aligned with the needs of the organisation.

Trust and Risk

Despite the excitement, caution is common among developers. Around 43 per cent say they trust AI generated code, while 45 per cent express concerns about its ability to manage complex challenges. This concern is valid, particularly as organisations begin to use AI in production environments. It is not always clear when code can be safely automated and when it still requires detailed oversight.

To address this, companies are formalising governance structures. Many are writing policies that define where AI can assist, what kinds of output require extra review, and how teams should document the use of AI in their systems. These efforts are about ensuring quality, managing risk and maintaining public trust, especially in sectors where transparency and accountability are essential.

Practical Examples

The benefits of thoughtful implementation are already visible. In Bengaluru, developers at a major software firm reported saving around 30 per cent of their time by using AI to handle routine tasks. In the UK public sector, a trial involving Microsoft Copilot led to daily time savings of 26 minutes per employee, with the biggest gains seen among junior staff. These improvements are not just about speed. Developers also reported reduced stress, fewer repetitive tasks, and more time to focus on meaningful work.

In each of these cases, the success of AI was tied to process. Developers still reviewed code manually. Teams documented their prompts. Feedback loops were in place to improve outcomes over time. AI was not used to replace judgment, but to support it.

Moving Forward

To make the most of generative AI, organisations need to do three things well. First, they must create boundaries that clarify where AI helps, but does not replace human reasoning. Second, they need strong review systems that catch errors and improve outputs over time. Third, they should track outcomes not just in terms of speed, but also in terms of code quality, team satisfaction, and delivery success.

When these foundations are in place, the result is more than just faster delivery. Developers can spend more time solving problems, mentoring colleagues, and experimenting with new ideas. Teams become more efficient and more resilient. Products improve in quality and reliability.

Final Thoughts

Generative AI is not about replacing human talent. It is about giving that talent better tools. When used carefully, AI can reduce routine work and help people focus on tasks that require judgment, creativity, and empathy. The best teams are already proving that this combination of human skill and AI support leads to better results.

By embedding AI into their processes and treating it as a partner, not a substitute, organisations are setting themselves up for long term success. The challenge now is to scale this approach in ways that remain thoughtful, inclusive, and grounded in real engineering discipline.

If used well, generative AI will not just make development faster. It will make it more human.

Join the IoA and prepare for the future of business

Sign up now to access the benefits of IoA Membership including 1400+ hours of training and resources to help you develop your data skills and knowledge. There are two ways to join: